Why a Federal Energy Fight Over Power Lines Could Raise Montana Electric Bills

A group of state lawmakers, including the chair of Montana's Senate Energy and Technology Committee, sent letters last week urging federal regulators to reject a utility push that would pause competition on new transmission line projects for five years.

The Complaint at the Center of This

Twelve utility companies filed the complaint in April. They want the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to suspend a rule called Order 1000, which currently forces utilities to bid against each other for the right to build new transmission projects in two regional grids, MISO and SPP. Drop that rule, and the utility already operating in an area gets the job automatically, no bidding required.

Montana sits outside both grids. But 56 legislators from Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Missouri, and Wisconsin signed on anyway, betting that whatever FERC decides here will shape how transmission rules get written everywhere else.

The Argument for Keeping Competition

A recent analysis from the R Street Institute put a number on what's at stake: transmission projects built through competitive bidding ran about 30% cheaper than projects handed to the incumbent utility without a bid process.

Paul Cicio, who chairs the Electricity Transmission Competition Coalition, put it bluntly. State legislatures have spent months trying to protect ratepayers from exactly this kind of move, and now it's up to FERC to decide whether that effort holds.

Get our free mobile app

Why Montanans Should Pay Attention Anyway

No Montana utility is named in this specific complaint. That's the part easy to miss here; however, the FERC rulings tend to ripple outward, and a decision that lets utilities skip competitive bidding gives every other utility in the country, including whoever serves your area, a template to ask for the same deal.

The commission hasn't ruled yet.